| BYWORD | READERS WRITE | ADVERTISE | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBE | COVER GALLERY | JOIN US ON FACEBOOK | IN MEMORIAM | 100th ISSUE | HOME |
![]() |
| Current Issue | ||||
![]() |
| BYWORD | READERS WRITE | ADVERTISE | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBE | COVER GALLERY | JOIN US ON FACEBOOK | IN MEMORIAM | 100th ISSUE | HOME |
![]() |
| Current Issue | ||||
| < Back To Article | |
|
Matches in Peril
|
| Text by Gita Aravamudan and llustration by Farzana Cooper | |||||||||
|
Published: Volume 15, Issue 12, December, 2007
|
|||||||||
|
The right to choose one’s spouse ought to be an undisputed given in the 21st century. But the headline-shattering cases of Priyanka Todi, Sweety Tater and Sreeja indicate that a liberal education and affluence do not guarantee the modern Indian woman the freedom to make marital decisions independent of parental approval. Gita Aravamudan analyses the issue
Like in the case of Rizwanur Rahman from Kolkata, who one morning was found dead on the railway tracks. Rizwanur, a 30- year-old Muslim man from a middle class family died because he married Priyanka Todi, the 23-year-old-daughter of an influential and wealthy Hindu industrialist. They were both adults who had the legal right to marry whomsoever they wished. How did he die? Was he murdered? Did he commit suicide? Who was responsible for his death? Rizwanur was educated. He taught graphic design at a multimedia institute in Kolkata. But he lived in a small, tin-roofed house in a teeming colony. He was devoted to his widowed mother. Certainly there were many who would have considered him an eligible bachelor. Her influential father could do nothing legally as they were two adults who had got married in court. But he used all the clout he had to separate them. And finally he achieved his goal. At what cost? Will Priyanka ever be happy again? Or does her happiness not matter at all as long as the family ‘honour’ is saved? Is honour killing an acceptable form of punishment even in a modern metropolis like Kolkata? And yet, if it happens to our own children, we realise the difference between reel and real life. Even as the CBI investigated Rizwanur’s death, the Chiranjeevi soap opera started unfolding on our newspapers and TV screens. Chiranjeevi, as everyone south of the Vindhyas knows, is the mega superstar of Telugu cinema. A man who would have many times over portrayed the unsuitable lover on the silver screen. Yet, one day, his 19-year-old younger daughter Srija eloped with her 22-year-old boyfriend Sirish. She eloped, she said, because her father found her lover unsuitable and had kept her under house arrest to prevent her from meeting him. Priyanka’s father had used detectives to dig up Rizwanur’s old girlfriend in a last ditch attempt to get his daughter back. In the Srija episode, an old ‘kidnapping’ case against Sirish surfaced. But the comparisons end there. Rizwanur is dead. Sirish and Srija are fine and living under police protection. Her father has publicly said he wants his daughter to be happy although he hasn’t exactly welcomed her home with open arms.
|
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
| Home | Subscribe to Verve | Cover Gallery | Advertisers | About Verve | Contact Us | |
| © Verve Magazine. Please read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use |